The Head of Service of the Federation, Mrs. Winifred Oyo-Ita, has said that President Muhammadu Buhari has the power to extend the tenure of a permanent secretary.
Oyo-Ita
was reacting to the position of the House of Representatives' Committee
on Basic Education which said the President has no such power under the
1999 Constitution (as amended).
The House committee had faulted Buhari's decision to extend the tenure of the Permanent Secretary,
Ministry of Education, Dr. Jamila Shu’ara, by one extra year.
Speaking
to journalists in an interview on Friday, March 31, the Head of Service
said the power vested in the President "to appoint also gives him the
authority over reinstatement and extension of tenure of a permanent
secretary as the case may be."
In its report, the
committee, chaired by a member of the All Progressives Congress, Mr.
Zakari Mohammed, pointed that while Section 171 of the constitution
empowered the President to appoint top officials of government,
including permanent secretaries, the provision did not cover the power
to extend a permanent secretary’s tenure.
It,
therefore, ordered Oyo-Ita to immediately invoke the relevant rules to
recover all the salaries and benefits paid to Shu’ara in the last one
year.
Oyo-Ita said: "Yes, I am very much in
the centre of the storm as it were as the Head of Service. But what I
tried to explain to the House Committee on Basic Education and Services
is that the permanent secretary is one of the four appointees in Section
171 subsection 2 (d) of the Nigerian constitution as amended, that Mr.
President has the full prerogative to appoint at his pleasure.
"The
appointments of permanent secretaries, ambassadors, Head of Service,
ministers and other such aides of Mr. President are wholly his
prerogative.
"The committee argued that
the provision covered appointments and not extension. But I further
supported that argument of government with the Interpretation Act 123 of
Nigeria which further goes to explain.
"The
Act says the powers that are vested in the person who has power to
appoint, that those power also gives him the authority over
reinstatement and extensions as the case may be.
"Their argument is that extension is not written there verbatim but when you reinstate somebody, it is as good as an extension.
"If
somebody was in a position for a period of time and you now reinstate
him back to that position, it is tantamount to say you have extended the
person’s stay on that position. So, I think the argument is more of
legal technicalities and I hope the matter will be resolved very soon."
Post a Comment